The search for the ultimate origin of reality often runs into a fundamental limit: standard pathways frequently lead to infinite regress or recursive explanations.
When we ask about the initial cause of the physical Universe, physics and philosophy often push the question one step further back—asking what caused that initial cause, or what preceded the Big Bang.
Il Significato dell'Universo (The Meaning of the Universe) was born from a precise methodological choice: to break away from conventional, beaten paths and approach the problem from a different angle.
Traditional physical inquiry primarily asks how things happen, tracing past events, physical mechanisms, and causal chains. However, investigating reality solely through the lens of physical causality (How) cannot explain why there is something rather than nothing.
To reach a foundational explanation, the inquiry must shift toward why reality exists. This requires examining not just the objects within the Universe, but the total framework of reality and the role of the observer.
How an object or a phenomenon appears depends on two factors: the reality of the object itself and the dimension from which it is observed:
Presentation = f (Reality; Dimensions)
By introducing reference dimensions—both physical (space, time, spacetime deformation) and transcendent (meaning, identity, communication)—we can analyze reality as a unified whole without falling into logical circularity.
This framework did not emerge from standard academic routines, but from a lifelong personal search for coherent answers that neither pure materialist reductionism nor traditional dogma fully satisfied. It reflects years of gradual refinement—from early philosophical intuitions to a structured model.
By stepping outside traditional frameworks, Il Significato dell'Universo offers an alternative lens: viewing physical reality as a zero-sum balance (absence) whose concrete order and existence are realized through meaning.